Visibility by industry
Explicit recommendation rate and average score.
Synta tested 50 brands across five China-export industries in 750 standardized, web-grounded answers from Perplexity, Qwen and DeepSeek. The result: being retrievable does not guarantee being recommended.
Executive finding
Thirty of the 50 brands received no explicit recommendation in any unbranded opportunity. Their websites may exist, rank or appear in retrieval, but the models did not have enough comparative evidence to place them on the buyer shortlist.
Among 33 brands whose official domains appeared in the study's shared retrieval evidence packs, 22 still received zero explicit recommendations. This 66.7% gap is a reproducible retrieval-visibility proxy, not a claim about Google or Bing organic rankings.
China-origin brands averaged 41.67 out of 100, compared with 55.33 for international benchmarks. The underlying unrounded gap was 13.67 points.
Explicit recommendation rate and average score.
The platform gap shows why one-engine monitoring is incomplete.
Complete brand attachment
| Rank | Brand | Industry | Score | Recommendation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tesla Energy | Energy storage | 72.77 | 63% |
| 2 | Fluence | Energy storage | 69.79 | 57% |
| 3 | FANUC | Industrial robotics | 67.74 | 57% |
| 4 | Universal Robots | Industrial robotics | 66.98 | 45% |
| 5 | Lonza | Life sciences services | 64.26 | 38% |
| 6 | ShipBob | Cross-border logistics | 61.31 | 27% |
| 7 | ABB Robotics | Industrial robotics | 59.25 | 35% |
| 8 | SIRIO Pharma | Nutraceuticals | 58.33 | 17% |
| 9 | Sungrow | Energy storage | 56.79 | 17% |
| 10 | BYD Energy Storage | Energy storage | 55.31 | 20% |
The public attachment includes all 50 brands, model-level scores, recommendation rates and citation totals. Full provider answers are retained for reproducibility and are not published. Rankings are research signals, not procurement endorsements.
Open research package
Use the executive report for decision-makers, the diagnostic appendix for brand-level review, and the data attachment for further analysis.
A five-page summary for global marketing and commercial leaders.
PDF · 5 pagesOne-page score, evidence and action summary for every benchmarked brand.
PDF · 52 pagesComplete rankings, platform scores, recommendation rates and citation totals.
CSV · all 50 brandsIt measures whether a brand is discovered, cited, compared and explicitly recommended in AI-assisted buyer research. It is distinct from traditional search ranking.
No. The study measures machine-visible evidence and recommendation behavior. It is not a product certification, procurement endorsement or market-share ranking.
No. The results come from standardized model API tests using a controlled protocol. Consumer interfaces may differ because of personalization, location, model routing and product features.
The public attachment includes the complete 50-brand ranking, model-level scores, recommendation rates and citation totals. Full provider answers are retained for internal reproducibility and are not published.
Request a brand diagnostic covering your company, three competitors and the buyer prompts that matter in your target market.